- When is an economy in recession and what is stagflation?
- Is a gravitational wave detection near Betelgeuse a sign the star is ready to explode?
- Elvis Presley's ex Linda Thompson on why she really left him: 'It was EXHAUSTING'
- 'This is going to be very ugly': Outdated myths about rape could play role in Weinstein defence
- Why Iran has little interest in a 'Trump Deal' with the White House
Scraping data from a website likely doesn’t violate anti-hacking laws as long as the data is public, a US court has concluded. Yesterday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals said LinkedIn probably couldn’t tell an analytics company to stop pulling profile information from its platform. LinkedIn had sent the company, HiQ, a cease-and-desist letter — which has been enough to declare companies “unauthorized” in earlier cases. Here, however, the court ruled that LinkedIn couldn’t use anti-hacking rules to control how HiQ used the data.
As University of California, Berkeley professor and computer law expert Orin Kerr lays out, this seemingly limits one section of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). The CFAA prohibits accessing a computer…
Powered by WPeMatico